In a podcast circulated last November, Shen Yifei, a sociologist at Fudan University, accused platforms like HIMMR of neglecting to bring obligation for advertising “good social prices,” and mentioned 985 students with “better informative backgrounds and social information” shouldn’t limit their selection when considering dating.
The organization, needless to say, protests it’s merely fulfilling an industry demand. In the same podcast, HIMMR’s co-founder taken care of immediately Shen’s responses, claiming the working platform “serves several people who have comparable experiences, backgrounds, and appeal, that isn’t blameworthy.”
Through the team’s viewpoint, HIMMR provides a very individual replacement for internet dating programs like Tinder — where people in the beginning swipe leftover or right founded mostly on a person’s seems — and old-fashioned Chinese match-making treatments, which routinely rank individuals based on what their age is, job, salary, and peak, among several other elements.
“Unlike additional systems, HIMMR does not treat customers like goods available,” says Wang, the company’s PR representative.
Though HIMMR details consumers’ degree records, Wang argues this is just an easy way to help promise consumers need situations in common. Alternatively, they determine both mainly on 1,000-character “personal tale” each accounts owner produces to introduce by themselves into the society, she claims.